My daughter had to give a presentation at school yesterday, and she decided to do it as a computer slideshow. We duly saved the work onto her USB memory stick, and as my daughter is only seven and a memory stick so small and losable, I sought out the teacher myself. As I handed over the memory stick I explained that the presentation was saved in two different formats as we weren't sure which would work best with the school's system, and I was met with polite bafflement, a nervous laugh and the usual comment along the lines of 'don't confuse me, I don't know the first thing about IT'.
We wouldn't use a lawyer who didn't have a clue about the law, or send our kids for music lessons with a teacher who couldn't play a note or football training with a coach who couldn't kick a ball to save his life.
Why, then, do we allow such a crucial part of our children's education to be guided by people who have little idea how to approach it?
Our children are expected to be confident users of a number of electronic media in order to learn. My teenage stepchildren routinely email homework to teachers and word-process essays or produce design assignments on the computer; our seven year old is expected to use several educational websites for homework, research and further learning. How, against this background, can a teacher cheerfully admit to being pretty much clueless when it comes to computers?
Who's being let down - children or teachers, or both?
Teacher training isn't my area, but the results of it, ie my children's education, most definitely are. Teachers should be supported so the hilt in bringing their IT-literacy up to scratch. Schools - and pupils - can only benefit from teachers feeling absolutely confident handling the technology that will increasingly underpin their teaching.
I’d Like to Thank my Mum….
-
E-Gads! An award! OK, it isn’t the Nobel Prize for Literature, but it is the
thought that counts. So, thank-you very much, Susie. May Allah step lightly
up...
23 hours ago